Skeuomorphism vs Neumorphism – Which Design Style Should You Choose?

Brian Bojan Dordevic
About The Author

Brian Decoded

President at Alpha Efficiency

Join me at the forefront of web design and digital marketing innovation. I am obsessed with web design, business philosophy and marketing performance.
I write Conversion Insider newsletter.

There’s an ongoing debate between skeuomorphism vs neumorphism, as both styles are dominant 2024 web design trends. But do you have trouble understanding the difference between skeuomorphism and neumorphism so you can decide which design approach to choose for your upcoming projects?

How do you choose which design style to master? Which will resonate more deeply with your audience and provide a better user experience? These challenges used to keep me up at night, as I wanted to ensure client websites would deliver high conversion rates.

Working on over 500 projects with my Los Angeles web design company, I’ve watched the evolution from skeuomorphic dominance to the rise of neumorphism. In this article, I’ll help you understand all the differences between skeuomorphism and neumorphism, along with the pros and cons of each design approach.

I’ll show you what makes each style unique so you can decide which one better suits your design philosophy and your target audience. This will prepare you for upcoming challenges and allow you to make more confident decisions as a design professional.

Table of Contents:
skeuomorphism vs neumorphism

What Is Skeuomorphism In UI Design?

If you analyze older UI designs closely, you’ll notice various elements that mimic real-life objects. It’s as if they’ve leaped right out of your everyday life and onto the display.

The term itself, with roots in the Greek words ‘skeuos’ (meaning vessel or container) and ‘morphe’ (English word meaning shape), reflects a tradition dating back to Ancient Greece, where craftsmen adorned pottery with designs that mimicked the more luxurious appearances of metal objects.

In the modern UI design, Apple stands out as a pioneer of skeuomorphism in digital interfaces. With the launch of the first iPhone, they bet big on the idea that users would find it easier and more intuitive to interact with icons and apps that resembled real-world counterparts. This design choice aimed to reduce the learning curve for new technology, leveraging users’ pre-existing knowledge of objects like notepads, calendars, and cameras.

Main Design Characteristics Of Skeuomorphic Style

Skeuomorphism characteristics

When you encounter a skeuomorphic design, you’re met with a digital canvas that feels almost tangible, thanks to a careful application of gradients, shadows, and detailed textures that create an illusion of depth and physicality.

Key elements such as buttons and switches don’t just sit flat on the screen; they pop out, inviting interaction. Gradient graphic design can make these features appear curved and glossy as if they’re catching the light like physical objects.

Shadows also play a critical role in this style. They add dimension and make it seem as though you could reach out and flip a switch or press a button with your own fingers.

Textures are another crucial aspect of the skeuomorphic design. Surfaces might mimic the fine grain of leather, the smoothness of glass, or the roughness of paper, enhancing the overall sensory experience.

Limitations Of Skeuomorphic Designs – Why You Might Want To Avoid This Style

While skeuomorphic designs hold a unique charm, they’re not without their own limitations. Understanding these drawbacks is crucial before using a skeuomorphism design style for your next project.

  • It can prevent you from experimenting: When you have to mimic real-life objects, it might prevent you from experimenting in various directions during the UI design process, potentially limiting your creativity.
  • Challenging adaptability: Skeuomorphic designs, with their rich details and depth, can be hard to scale across different screen sizes and resolutions.
  • Sacrificing functionality for aesthetics: The emphasis on making elements look real and tactile can overshadow the need for clear, intuitive usability. Designers might find themselves prioritizing the look of a notepad or a dial over how easily and efficiently users can interact with it, leading to a beautiful but less functional interface.
  • Some audiences might find them ‘outdated’: While some might appreciate their warmth and familiarity, others may view skeuomorphic designs as outdated or old-fashioned. As digital design trends evolve, the realistic textures and detailed shadows characteristic of skeuomorphism may not resonate with audiences seeking a sleeker, more modern aesthetic in user interfaces.

What Is Neumorphism In UI Design?

Neumorphism UI example

Neumorphism emerged as a fresh take on design in 2020, signaling a shift towards a modernized interpretation of skeuomorphism tailored for today’s digital audience. The term ‘neumorphism’ blends ‘new’ with ‘skeuomorphism,’ encapsulating its essence as a novel iteration of a familiar concept.

Neumorphism reimagines skeuomorphism by focusing on soft, subtle shadows and light to create the illusion of depth and dimensionality in interface components. Unlike its predecessor, which often relied on detailed textures and mimicry of real-world materials, neumorphism opts for a minimalist graphic design approach.

One of the most notable pioneers of this trend is Apple, particularly with its iOS 14 update, where neumorphic design principles were applied to some of the built-in apps. This move by a tech giant legitimized neumorphism as a significant design trend. It also set a benchmark for how digital interfaces could blend the innovative with the intuitive.

Main Design Characteristics of Neumorphic Style

In neumorphism, design characteristics of skeuomorphism are stripped down to a minimum. This approach brings a breath of fresh air to UI design, focusing on minimalism and subtlety without sacrificing the tactile feel that users find intuitive and engaging.

Neumorphism favors a minimalist color palette, predominantly featuring pale, desaturated colors. These hues are chosen for their low contrast and ability to blend seamlessly into the design. Unlike the more pronounced gradients of skeuomorphism, neumorphic design employs gradients sparingly, utilizing them to subtly draw attention to specific areas without overwhelming the user’s visual senses.

This style also redefines the use of effects. oft shadows and light gradients are employed to create an impression of depth and dimensionality, evoking the sensation of interface components gently pressing against or emerging from the background. This style opts for a clay render aesthetic for analog elements, reminiscent of skeuomorphism but stripped back to its most basic form. It is notably easy to implement neumorphic web page effects with HTML and CSS, so you might notice increased page speed.

If you’d like to learn more details, I’ve prepared a guide on how to create neumorphism in Figma.

Potential Drawbacks – Why Neumorphism Isn’t An Ideal Choice For Every Design Project

While neumorphism boasts a sleek aesthetic, it’s crucial to acknowledge its potential limitations:

  • Accessibility issues: One of the primary concerns with neumorphism relates to accessibility, particularly for users with visual impairments. The style’s hallmark of low contrast and subtle differences can make it difficult for these users to navigate and interact with the interface effectively. Text and interactive elements may blend too seamlessly into the background, hindering legibility and usability.
  • More difficult to create: Neumorphism demands a nuanced understanding of light, shadow, and color theory to achieve its signature look of soft, inset, and extruded shapes. Crafting these subtle effects requires a delicate balance, making it more time-consuming and technically challenging than more straightforward design styles. You might have to deal with extended development timelines, so I don’t recommend experimenting with this style if you’re on a tight deadline.
  • Not ideal choice for all projects: Neumorphism’s unique aesthetic and design characteristics may not align with every brand’s identity or project’s goals. Its minimalist and futuristic look might clash with brands that have a more traditional or vibrant identity.

Skeuomorphism vs Neumorphism – Side By Side Comparison

When choosing between skeuomorphism vs neumorphism, it’s crucial to understand how each influences user interaction, aesthetics, and the design process itself. Hopefully, this side-by-side comparison will help you decide between these two design approaches:

Skeuomorphism is easier to understand for users

Skeuomorphism significantly reduces the learning curve for end-users. Its design is deeply rooted in the mimicry of real-world objects, offering an intuitive experience. This can be especially beneficial for those less familiar with digital interfaces. Its use of high contrast and explicit visual cues also enhances usability for users with visual impairments.

Neumorphism, while elegant and innovative, may require your audience to adjust to its subtler interaction cues, potentially posing a slight challenge to immediate understanding. This shouldn’t be much of a challenge if you’re targeting tech-savvy audiences, but it’s a factor worth considering in a strategic website design approach.

Neumorphism can look more luxurious

Neumorphism excels in delivering a luxurious and sophisticated aesthetic. This style is ideal for brands aiming to convey a modern and upscale image.

Conversely, skeuomorphism provides a sense of warmth and familiarity through its detailed, textured designs, appealing to audiences looking for a more traditional digital experience.

Neumorphism looks more modern

For projects that aim to project a cutting-edge design ethos, neumorphism stands out as the more contemporary choice. Its emphasis on simplicity and the illusion of soft depth positions it at the forefront of modern UI trends.

Skeuomorphism, with its nostalgic appeal, offers a different value, connecting users with a sense of familiarity and time-tested usability.

Skeuomorphism is usually easier to create

From a design perspective, skeuomorphism is generally more straightforward to create. Drawing inspiration from physical objects allows you to translate real-world textures and details into digital space with relative ease.

Neumorphism, however, demands a cautious approach to shadow and light, as well as a mastery of color theory, making it a more complex style to execute effectively.

Final Thoughts – Stay Ahead Of Trends As A Professional

As a professional web designer, you should aim to master various styles. The ongoing debate between skeuomorphism vs neumorphism serves as a vivid reminder of how swiftly trends can shift within the industry. While neumorphism might currently enjoy the spotlight for its modern and sophisticated aesthetic, history has shown us that the pendulum of design preference is always in motion. Skeuomorphism, with its intuitive and tactile approach, is still a relevant style.

However, the conversation doesn’t stop with skeuomorphism vs neumorphism. Another trend worth exploring is glassmorphism UI, a style characterized by transparency and multi-layered interfaces that mimic the look and feel of glass.

Remember, each style offers unique advantages and challenges. The ability to blend or pivot between them based on project needs, client preferences, and target audience will set you apart as a designer.


Fresh inspiration is a fingertip away,
Download Our Portfolio.

Download Our Portfolio